A Search for the Truth (part 24)

Hey everyone. I will be keeping tonight’s update short and to the
point.

We have a few details that need to be addressed.

First being that more then one person informed me that miss
information was being given to the families and the public on this
case from the beginning. I could not address this until miss
information was provided to the public and/or us involving this
case, and I had proof of this.

Well now I do!

This is directed to the statement made by Mr. Abbett in the O-A News
when he took a cheap shot at me. Mr. Abbett please research your
statements in the future before taking such shots at people like
myself. We will take the time to research our replies to such
statements.

The statement made in the O-A News read as follows:
Abbett said. “That’s not uncommon. With a steel-cased bullet, with
an impact wound with all the hot gases that come with a gun being
fired like that, it’s common for the entrance wound to be larger.
It’s not inconsistent, it says right there in the text and in the
drawing.”

According to the Firearms Examination/Laboratory results regarding
the bullet used in Vaughan’s death it states the following:
Item 3A- one manila envelope labeled in part 2 containing 1-fired
Winchester brand cartage case, cal. 380 auto.
Item 3B- one manila envelope labeled in part 3 containing1-fired
Winchester brand cartage case, cal. 380 auto.

The bullet was fired according to the same report from a Walter
pistol (item 1) model PPK-S cal.9mm Kurtz/.380

Although I have full trust in the people that have been providing us
with information about this bullet and this gun, I needed something
more.

I took the liberty to e-mail Winchester direct and find out if they
made a steel-cased bullet (as Abbett referred to) in this caliber
that could possibly be fired from this gun. Winchester themselves
stated in an e-mailed reply (I am not a DA like you Abbett, but I do
believe that an e-mail is considered legal document. If I am wrong,
please correct me on that point), that they do not make this bullet
in question as a steel-cased bullet.

Either Winchester is lying in their response or you made what as a
DA I believe you (Abbett) would call a “miss-leading statement”,
this was done in a manner to discredit someone’s creditability with
the public. I do believe there is a term for that too, however I
think our readers will be happy to comment on that for me.

The issue I would like to address is if you would make a “miss
leading statement” in a manner to discredit someone’s creditability
with the public regarding this case, what did you and/or other
officials say to these family members at the time of the original
investigation? Were these boys families in fact miss-lead as you
attempted to do to us with your statement quoted above?

Have you or anyone from any official’s ever spoke with these boys’
families and presented them with anything that resembles fact? Or is
everything that I heard true?

I would like to note to our readers that Abbett stated that I was
wrong with my understanding of the autopsy report due to the fact
the findings were not uncommon with a steel-cased bullet. He never
stated in this statement (nor did it state this in the Laboratory
results) that a steel-cased bullet was in fact what they found to be
the bullet that killed Vaughan. How would you the readers take this
with the current information I provided today?

Then we need to address the fact that Abbett stated that the
findings of the autopsy were not uncommon. I have not heard from one
source that this is the case. In fact I have only heard that it is
not the case, and Abbett was wrong. I am awaiting an e-mail reply on
this before making a definite statement as to this being miss
leading as well. But at this point, I feel it is very miss leading.

Also it to the best of my knowledge, Abbett is a District Attorney
and Jones is the one that teaches Forensics. That being the case,
why would Abbett make such a statement instead of Jones?

We have someone researching the background of Jones and his
credentials (which I already know are good on paper); we will be
doing the same with Abbett. I am looking forward to finding out just
how extensive of a background in Forensics he has.

That brings us to the final thing for this week.

Let’s all assume that I am 100% wrong on everything and both Abbett
and Jones are 100% right. You gave me the benefit of the doubt; why
not give it to them?

I would like to ask our readers to use whatever search engines they
would like, and do the following searches as I have them typed below
(including quotes):
“Sheriff Jay Jones”
“Jay Jones Alabama”
“Abbett Alabama”
“DA Abbett Alabama”

See what you come up with.

If you come up with problems, that will explain a lot with this
case. But I am sure that you will only come up with good things.

Does this make you (the readers) think about why if these men have
such a good track record on paper they would not want to address
issues questioning their handling of this case and why they would
have to take cheap shots to try and break us down? Why would they
not speak to us and help to clear their name with us as well as any
miss understanding’s they feel we may have?

I will be watching for a post from them this week, as well as the
comments from our readers. I truly hope they will join us and work
with us instead of against us. If they choose not to post for us,
that is fine too. We will just have to ask these questions from
others till someone answers us. If any of our readers would like to
recommend other sources, please feel free to post the sources names,
address’ and/or e-mail address below.

Thank you,
A.Wallace

Visit The Weekly News at http://TheWeeklyNews.info
or join our mailing list to get weekly updates
at http://yourdesign2.com/mailinglist.htm

A Search for The Truth (part 23)

On a personal note:

A lot of people have been waiting for my reply to this article in
the Opelika-Auburn News written by Mitch Sneed.

I have been fighting within myself as to how to respond to this. I
am not one to take things lying down. But this is not my fight, or
so I tried to convince myself. After a few days of going back and
forth, I came to the conclusion that a leopard cannot change it’s
spots, and I can’t be something I am not.

That being said, this has been made my battle now (see prepared
statement below). It is and always will be Debbi’s fight to know the
truth as to what took place with her son’s murder, but statements by
both Jones and Abbett made it my fight more then Debbi’s at this
point. The two of you gentlemen made some statements, unlike you I
will not sit back and let these statements go unanswered.

You (Jones and Abbett) have been, are now and always be welcome to
hit me with any questions that you would like as well as make any
statements against me that you feel just in making.

But understand that terms like “Wallace’s accounts and claims”
(made by Jones) and “There’s nothing to discuss” (made by Abbett)
will not go without a response by me. Do not make statements to,
about or involving my blog or anything involving my name unless you
are willing to stand behind those statements. Because I am the one
that will follow through until not only this matter of the boys is
put to rest, but will also follow through until I feel that any
thing said against my name and/or service has been dealt with to my
satisfaction. And yes I was informed by Earl that someone from the
Sheriff’s Dept. is following this blog “VERY CLOSLY”, so I am aware
that you are reading along. You wanted me, you got me ;) I hope I
am what you expected.

Please accept the following as my public statement for any/all
public media, blogs official records, etc. and feel free to post/use
it as you see fit. I do require that if this statement is used in
whole or in part that a link back to TheWeeklyNews.info be included.
Without a link back, permission to re-use is not granted.

I would like to address the issues one at a time, I will be
addressing them in the order that I see fit not the order that they
were presented.

The statement made by Earl Barr in the Opelika-Auburn News on
October 13, 2006 (article title “Case closed?”).
I understand that Mitch Sneed only had a limited time to interview
Mr. Barr and therefore would receive a limited reaction. Especially
for those of us that have talked with Earl, we know you do not have
a quick talk with Earl. He is a great man, but you need to take the
time to listen to him, or you do not get everything. I on the other
hand have used the caution to make my calls to Earl on my cell phone
to document the time I invested into him prior to making any
statements public. I have spent hours at a time talking with Earl
and have never heard anything other then what he said in the
interview that he supplied to us (the opposite of what was said to
Mitch). I spoke with Earl after this interview with Mitch was made
public and heard of how Russell runs in the house and locks the door
behind him like he is scared of something. This is something I heard
many of times before. But what was different this time is how I
heard in about a 1 hour talk not less then 5 or 6 times about how
there was going to be a law suite, this was about to blow up in
someone’s face, the Sheriff’s office is following this article real
close (if you look at past post, I already knew this by my site
stats) and how he (Earl) could not afford to lose his house and cars.
This was not the same man I spoke to in the past. This was not the
Earl that everyone knows to be strong willed, the man who knew what
he saw, the man that knew what he was told during the original
investigation by officials. This was another man. A man that
appeared to me to fear something, a man that appeared to put his
material possessions before his family and his Bible and man that
appeared to be acting as he was told by others not his heart. This
statement will not make much sense to some people, but to everyone
that knows or knew him it will make a lot of sense. I took the time
to get to know him. I recommend that anyone who investigates this
story for media or legal reason’s do the same.
I want to know who or what changed that man. I want to know why they
would take a good man like Earl and cause him to act like this. I
want to know.

Debbi and I were given only hours to prepare a statement for the
News. This was not a fare way to approach this. Especially sense the
paper read, “Attempts to reach Murphy were unsuccessful”. Sorry to
do this Mitch, but I personally e-mailed Debbi’s statement to you.
There fore that was not an accurate statement. As a former community
leader, I can deal with speaking for the public on a moments notice
(if I choose to do so), but as a mother who suffered the loss of a
son Debbi needs to be allowed time to adjust to the media getting
involved once again. Also when calling Debbi’s house, you spoke with
her husband. You mad it a point to take statements from the
stepmother, why would you not ask any questions from the step
farther, especially when you were on the phone with him, had a dead
line and needed information? This is by no means looking at all
sides of the story. You also spoke to me of the letter we sent out
stating that “Vaughan was shot in the back of the head’. There is no
medical examiner in this world that will confuse our statement “the
temple” for the back of the head. Mitch you spoke of your experience
in the police academy to someone in an e-mail today (yes I have read
the e-mail), you spoke to me (in an e-mail) of your awards, yet you
made a mistake with me like this from day one. Bad move, how would
you expect me to provide you with everything I have after something
like that? You even stated to me in e-mail that you had no way to
contact me (note that you stated this by contacting me in an e
mail). Yet the first time we spoke, you called my pager number and I
called you back within an hour. Sorry Mitch, but this is the kind of
behavior that has been described to me as being of the officials by
people of the community, I didn’t expect to experience it from a
staff writer of the local paper. Even with this being said, you took
offence to the fact that I said I felt like you were playing games.
If I were to make the same mistakes with you, you would have felt
the same as I do. This is where you need to be honest with yourself,
regardless what you say to this publicly. You have to live with you,
I don’t!

Now, more than two years after the murders, stories called “A search
for the truth” posted on the Internet site
http://localnews.yourdesign2.com/ is calling the investigation into
question and asking for the case to be reopened.
This makes this sound like this has been dormant for over 2 ½ years.
It has not. The fact is that I have in my possession letters form
D.A. Abbett from 2 or 3 separate dates stating that he stands by the
finding of the grand jury and no where it the letters does it state
or indicate that your are willing to talk with anyone further.

This brings us to Abbett’s statement “There’s nothing to discuss,”
made to Opelika-Auburn News. Mr. Abbett this is where you are wrong
and yes that is a statement. As the Distract Attorney you are a
public official and as a public official part of your job criteria
(you are welcome to correct me if I am wrong) is to serve the public
of the communities in which you serve. The taxpayers pay your salary
and you have both a moral and legal obligation to provide a service
to them. The homicides that took place involving Daniel Foster is
considered one of the most horrific scenes in Lee County history.
Therefore as a public official it is your obligation that if even
one parent of the victims has questions, you see that they are
answered. Should you feel that that parent be unable to accept or
cope with what took place, you are required to assist that parent in
getting assistance in coping with the shock. Being that I (as well
as others, I am not dumb enough to retain the only copies) have
copies of your letters from the past and the fact that your office
signed for a recent letter to which you never even took the time to
reply, you can not at this time claim that this is the act of a
parent that is not coping and have to acknowledge that this is the
act of a parent that does not agree with the findings. This is where
your role as a D.A. obligates you to look into things further or
provide answers. I have been around the circles enough during my
work with the officials and the communities to know just what can be
done should a D.A. want it done. If you had answered some questions
in the past, I would not be typing this statement today. Now we will
be getting answers, the question is will you be providing them?
As a note to Abbett, the letter your office signed for and we did
not receive a reply to did state that if we didn’t get some answers
we will be going to the media, and we gave about 2 months for you to
reply.

I liked the statement by Mr. Jones as well. The one that went as
follows:

“I’m a bit hesitant to address the issue, because you don’t want to
give something that has so much misinformation much credibility,”
Jones said. “But with this effort out there to bring attention to
it, I feel I almost have to. A lot of what is written there - well
there’s no other way to say it - is just wrong.
“I’m a public official and a certain amount of criticism comes with
the job, but to have this turn into personal attacks, with things
out there that are just not true, is a bit over the top.”

Jones, months before this letter I personally called your department
twice and left messages for you both times. As we know almost every
police and Sheriffs department in the country has it so that even
phones with caller ID blocking on it will show the number. Therefore
it would be in the records of your departments phone logs if this
were the case. Both these calls went unanswered. I cannot say if you
did or did not get the messages, I can say that I did not get a call
back. As said with Abbett above, if you were to reply then, I would
not be typing this statement now. You even made note to the affect
that this (my articles) has so much misinformation and that is why
you are a bit hesitant to address the issue. This should be even
more of a reason for you to address the issue, a reason to clear up
any “misinformation” that may be getting posted and a reason to show
who is right and who is wrong. Your information, statements (even
ones against me), etc. are welcome on my postings. You can feel free
to send anything you wish to me at LocalNews@WorldBreak.com and I
will post it word for word as it was sent if you would like. But do
not even start to try and go after me for providing me
with “misinformation” when you will not return a phone call. As a
law official you know that if only one side of the story is told,
only one side will be heard. You want your side heard, then speak up
and say it, I will be happy to share it as I did other information.
But when you will not speak up, don’t complain when you hear about
it being one sided. I would expect that from children, we are grown
men and need to give each other the respect that grown men deserve.
I gave you that respect with two phone calls; you return it with a
statement like this. That is not respect!
You stated “I’m a public official and a certain amount of criticism
comes with the job. I was a public figure at one time and I too know
about the criticism that comes with the job. That is why I made sure
as a public figure, I spoke up and made my voice heard if there was
something that warranted my attention. I know your not a fool and I
would expect you to do the same, therefore I can only assume that
you thought that Debbi and I were not worth your attention.

This was in the paper (it was not clear if it was said by Jones or
was just added in as part of the article, but it was not done as a
direct quote), and it is WRONG:
Wallace’s accounts and claims are based on documents that have been
provided to him by Debbi Foster-Murphy, Daniel Foster’s mother. He
said he has tried to talk with Abbett and Jones but that his calls
and a registered letter requesting information have been ignored.
None of you know just who I have and have not spoken with, therefore
I have no idea just how you came up with this information. But here
are some facts for you to consider.
Before even starting this article, I spoke with Debbi back and forth
for a few months until I was sure I wanted to take this on. Yes
Debbi has supplied me with a lot of information. But Debbi is not
the only person in that county.
I have spoken with not less then 12 people form that area in the
course of this article. Some of which were witness to police
investigations, both on and off the crime scene. I have had the
autopsy reports reviewed by others, whose knowledge in this area far
surpasses my knowledge. I have in my possession letters that were
sent out from Abbett’s office on his letterhead and with his
signature which helped me to come to my personal conclusions. I have
in my possession a copy of unofficial (therefore not admissible to
any court of law and/or as cause to reopen this case) of some case
sensitive documents.
What I do not have in my possession is any form of information
supplied by or on the behalf of either the Sheriff’s Dept. or the
Attorney Generals office in their defense to what has been placed in
my articles, even though I have made attempts to get such
information.

Please note that all information listed above that I have in my
possession has been copied and is also in the hands of others should
I be unavailable and it be needed.

I would like to add that I know that the response that was received
by the Opelika-Auburn News, Abbett and Jones in relation to this
article is not what was expected. In fact I have been receiving
copies of the same replies and they are in favor of the fact that
this case needs to be looked into further. What I find amusing is
the fact that anyone thought that the voices of the people would not
speak up. I don’t mind making a name for myself with this one, but
we can put this to rest by simply making everything available to the
parties needed.

In closing I would like to say that I am willing to admit that I
could have been able to make a mistake in some things along the way
with this article, after all I am human and humans WE ALL do make
mistakes. If this is the case, please help me to see where my
mistakes are and I will be more then happy to correct them, be the
corrections in my favor or not.

I do have a direct question for Abbett and Jones. Is it a fact that
it was said that Vaughn had to reload the gun after his first
attempt failed? I have heard this and would like to confirm if it is
true or not. Please confirm.

As always, I would like to ask EVERYONE to post their comments below
or send them to us at LocalNews@WorldBreak.com

Thank you,
A.Wallace

Visit The Weekly News at http://TheWeeklyNews.info
or join our mailing list to get weekly updates
at http://yourdesign2.com/mailinglist.htm

Loving Heart Memorials

After almost a half a year of working with the article “A Search for
the Truth”, I’ve come to learn a lot that I never knew before. I
learned just how many people out there would like to find justice
for their loved ones, I learned how little compassion people have
for those trying to keep the memory of a loved on alive. I even had
the un-pleasuring experience of seeing how the dollar is more
important to some people then doing the right thing.

It was saddening to see how I had to make corrections to someone’s
memorial for their son cause the person charging for the work had no
idea what they were doing.

I am not one to live in a fog or see things through rose-colored
glasses as the saying goes, but I do believe that there should be
some morals when it comes to doing business and dealing with people.

With that being said, Debbi (Daniel’s mother, one of the boys from A
Search for the Truth) and I will be launching our own place for
online memorials next week.

As with any service we will expect to make some profit off it, but
we will commit to helping those that we can in the process,
conducting business with the morals and compassion that needs to be
applied in a service like this. We will be committing to providing
these families and the loved ones they have lost with the respect
that they deserve.

Loving Heart Memorials will be the first one of it’s kind. I am sure
there will be many to follow, but none like what we will be
providing. With the owners being a mother who experienced a loss
herself and wants nothing but the best for her son’s memories and
myself who committed many work hours over the last 22 weeks to
assist this mother in finding justice of her child’s murder. Debbi
knows what the pain is and I know how much it takes to fight for
what is right. Who is better to provide such a service?

If between Debbi and myself we can’t under stand what you’re going
through and find it in our hearts to see that you get the best for
your loved ones, then no one will.

So if you’re looking for a way to immortalize the memory of a loved
one, consider visiting us at LovingHeartMemorials.com and let us
help set you up with a memorial that will be within your budget and
still show the respect that your loved one deserves.

Debbi and I would both like to thank you for your time in reading
this.
And if we may be of service to you, please visit us at
LovingHeartMemorials.com

Have a great and blessed day.

By A. Wallace
TheWeeklyNews.info/YourDesign2.com

Visit The Weekly News at http://TheWeeklyNews.info
or join our mailing list to get weekly updates
at http://yourdesign2.com/mailinglist.htm

A Search for the Truth (part 22)

Previously we covered the requirements to be a Sheriff in lee County
Alabama.

This week I would like to see just how minimal those requirements
are. To do so, we will take a look at what the Guide to State
Residency Requirements is on Policy and Practice at U.S. Public
Colleges and Universities of ALABAMA ad compare them to what is
required to become a Sheriff.

You will see that it is much harder to be considered a resident for
a local College then if is to be a Sheriff and have the
responsibility of protecting both the College students as well as
the public of Alabama.

By the end of this article, you’ll see just how the system is
designed to make our children’s futures harder and how they have a
full disregard for our safety.

Please add your comments after the facts below. These laws affect
all of us no matter where we are located. By allowing rules like
these to be applied, we also allow people like Jones to disregard
information as he did in the case of the murder of these three boys.

Facts below are provided in accordance with the College Entrance
Examination Board for Alabama and the Lee County Sheriffs Dept
(through both public statements and their web site).

Requirements for residency by a College Student as apposed to
requirements to become a Sheriff:

Collage:
The Alabama universities surveyed require applicants to have had a
permanent abode in Alabama for at least twelve consecutive months
preceding registration. No person who moves to Alabama for the
primary purpose of attending college shall be considered to have
demonstrated intent to establish Alabama domicile, and will
generally not be considered eligible for resident classification.

Sheriff:
You are required to be a resident of the county for 24 hours.

College:
The University of Alabama notes that a student reaches the age of
majority at 19 years and may then apply for residency one year
thereafter, at age 20. At that time, the student must have (for 12
months) severed all ties to the former state and have the intent to
remain in Alabama indefinitely.

Sheriff:
Applicants must be eighteen years-of-age


College:
Evidence of Domicile, Including but not Limited to: voter and
vehicle registration; Alabama driver's license; filing of an Alabama
resident tax return; ownership of real or personal property in
Alabama and payment of state taxes thereon (home, auto, boat, etc.);
full-time permanent employment in Alabama; maintenance of
checking/savings and investment accounts as well as safe deposit
boxes; in-state address shown on selective service registration,
insurance policies, stock and bond registrations, last will and
testament, annuities, retirement plans, hunting and fishing
licenses; and possession of business or professional licenses in
Alabama.

Sheriff:
We could not find anything stating requirements that someone running
for Sheriff has any requirements to show proof of residency.

College:
Exceptions to the rule above include (but not limited to) U.S.
military personnel on active duty stationed in Alabama and Full-time
faculty members and employees of a State of Alabama agency or
institution.

Sheriff:
There is no need for an exception, just be a resident of the county
for 24 hours.

There are a lot more examples that I can provide, but I think that
the few examples above get the point across.

Given the information above, if you were moving to Lee County
Alabama, would you rather run for Sheriff or go to College and
continue your education?

Running for Sheriff sounds pretty good to me. It provides an income
quickly and is a lot easier to get in to then College.

Could that have been the view of the people in the Lee County
Sheriff’s Dept?
Could that have been one of the flaws that allowed the investigation
of these three boys to be handled so poorly?

During the investigation that took place in 2004, Sheriff Jones was
offered the assistance of the Opelika County Police Dept. and
refused it. He did not refuse it after a verbal conversation. The
people from Opelika County Police Dept. took the time to go to the
crime scene and offer their help. After arriving at the scene, they
were sent away.

Sheriff Jones has a pretty extensive background, but if he had to
apply for Collage as a Resident, he may have had a little more feeling and compassion for the people of the community and accepted
the assistance from other law agencies.

Sheriff Jones also has a background based on drug bust that involved
the assistance of out side offices. His record of solving crimes
like break-ins of people’s homes is something to be desired at best.
But break-ins are something he would have to solve on his own. Could
that be part of the reason?

If the best part of Sheriff Jones background involved the assistance
of others, it would raise question as to why he would turn away help
when faced with the biggest homicide case that faced the county in
years.

If Sheriff Jones has enough education to be teaching Forensics at
the local College, I cant find any reason the he would over look the
fact that there were so many conflicts within Vaughan’s autopsy
reports. Conflicts that I with limited training in law enforcement
and procedures picked up on with out any delay.

I still have trouble getting past the fact that Vaughan was close
enough to Jones to run his campaign to become Sheriff in 1998, yet
Jones seemed to not know anything about Vaughan driving a truck that
was reported stolen nor did he seem to have knowledge of the
extensive amount of guns that Vaughan had.

I became a public figure in my area in 2002, and to this day I know
all the people that were a big part of my making it to the top. I
know what they are into and I follow how there doing in the
communities. Mind you, I stepped out of the spotlight in 2003.
Therefore I have no logical reason to keep up to date on these
people.

Jones is still in office as the local Sheriff and should have more
of a reason then me to know who is affiliated with him. Also given
the fact that Jones is getting ready to run for Sheriff again in the
near future, it is even more important for him now then before to
show that he is looking to do the right thing and find justice in
this case.

Yet Jones seams pretty content in his current position. What Jones
is relying on at this point is the support of the large commercial
companies, the local political figures, the local law firms, etc.
After the failure to conduct the investigation of these 3 boys
properly, threats made to local citizens involved in this case and
additional problems. The support of the people of the area will not
be there for Jones. But the support of the large firms may be enough
to keep him in office.

This is why we need the local papers and news shows involved. We
need to get the corporate world of the area on our side, show them
that the people have a voice and they do not own us. We need to
speak up and do our part or the next Sheriff Jones may be protecting
your local town.

If you have not done so yet, please e-mail TheTruth@Akpcsales.net
and ask for your copy of the letter we are sending out. You will
need to print about 26 copies, sign them and mail them on October
10th.

These letters will help to prevent people like Sheriff Jones from
ignoring the citizens, covering up their mistakes and hurting us as
a hole. Jones is just one man the fight is only starting with him
being in the spot light, there will be more.

As part of the new service Debbi and I will be launching next week
(temporary site is up and can be viewed at
www.LovingHeartMemorials.com) we will also be setting up as part of
that service “A Search for the Truth” as an extension of this
article. This will allow others like Debbi to get their voices
heard, get the support of others and with God’s will, find the Truth
for their loved ones.

This fight started in Alabama, but will continue till it reaches
your local community and makes your life the best it will be. But
for it to continue, we need your involvement with posting comments
and sending in the letters.

I would like to thank everyone for following along with this case.
One voice may be like a breeze passing by, but many voices will be
like the thunder from the sky. It’s time to unite and create that
thunder, shake their roofs and let them know that hell will rise if
our angels are not allowed to rest with peace. The peace of knowing
that Justice has truly been served and “A Search for the Truth” has
finally come to an end for their loved ones who are still with us.

Thanks again,
A. Wallace

Written by A. Wallace
Researched by Cindy (Thanks for the help Cindy)
TheWeeklyNews.info/YourDesign2.com

Visit The Weekly News at http://TheWeeklyNews.info
or join our mailing list to get weekly updates
at http://yourdesign2.com/mailinglist.htm